3 ms·

Well thats because you dont understand GDPR. If the company doesnt conduct any business in EU - or more correctly with EU private persones - then GDPR doesnt a

Well thats because you dont understand GDPR. If the company doesnt conduct any business in EU - or more correctly with EU private persones - then GDPR doesnt apply to the company. It also doesnt apply for any Business-2-business relations. GDPR only applies if you are providing a service to a EU citizen. That also explains what EU will do if a company doesnt comply with GDPR (where it should); they will stop the company from providing those services to the EU citizen. This is also why blocking EU traffic doesnt make you GDPR compliant (I can use a vpn or visit your site when travelling, and then you are still providing a service to a EU citizen). If the case really is as you say, with just serving http request, then you have no issue with being GDPR compliant, because you dont store and information about the EU citizen. If however you are not just serving http requests, but track the user or otherwise store information on the site visitor, then you may have GDPR issues. But if you do store data about your users, you really should treat the data correctly. GDPR is common sense, and if you bother to understand it correctly, its fairly easy to be compliant. Though I’d say, the bigger the company the more complex the implementation.

mychael 8y ago
You're mistaking GDPR's intent with its implementation, an error that lots of people are making. As Americans we're particularly sensitive about having to follow rules made by people who don't represent us and are not accountable to us. This is a totally fair and justifiable reason to be against GDPR even if you agree with its objectives.
- Msurrow 8y ago
  “As Americans we’re particularly sensitive about having to follow rules made by [others]” That may be one of the most ironic comments I’ve ever heard. I love americans, but as a super power you stick your nose into so many other countries business, directly or indirectly. So, lets just say that argument is not gonna change my view in any way. I don’t think I am mistaking intent with implementation. The regulation’s written text leavea many details to be answered along the way and the first couple of rulings on GDPR will (hopefully) bring us a lot of insigts into how to interpret and implement GDPR in practice. So I guess no one really knows the implementation yet. Until then we have to go by what is reasonable and the intent. And if you store data on private citizens you better treat it correctly.

mychael 8y ago

You're mistaking GDPR's intent with its implementation, an error that lots of people are making. As Americans we're particularly sensitive about having to follow rules made by people who don't represent us and are not accountable to us. This is a totally fair and justifiable reason to be against GDPR even if you agree with its objectives.

Msurrow 8y ago
“As Americans we’re particularly sensitive about having to follow rules made by [others]” That may be one of the most ironic comments I’ve ever heard. I love americans, but as a super power you stick your nose into so many other countries business, directly or indirectly. So, lets just say that argument is not gonna change my view in any way. I don’t think I am mistaking intent with implementation. The regulation’s written text leavea many details to be answered along the way and the first couple of rulings on GDPR will (hopefully) bring us a lot of insigts into how to interpret and implement GDPR in practice. So I guess no one really knows the implementation yet. Until then we have to go by what is reasonable and the intent. And if you store data on private citizens you better treat it correctly.