> if we're going to have to make up a definition of free will we might as well So we've begged the question. To me, the way this is worded, it lays bare that

> if we're going to have to make up a definition of free will we might as well So we've begged the question. To me, the way this is worded, it lays bare that compatibilism is about the ethics of 'free-will' and not its ontology. It's a completely different discussion and somewhat counterproductive.