> The fact that these aren't seriously considered makes it very clear that no one respects freedom of movement across national borders in the same way they resp

> The fact that these aren't seriously considered makes it very clear that no one respects freedom of movement across national borders in the same way they respect freedom of speech of freedom of movement across city borders. Because these are rights guaranteed to American citizens, not universal rights. The UK doesn't have freedom of speech and whether or not I like it that's totally their prerogative. There are also many cities in the world that are not free to move to (Mecca and Pyongyang come to mind). I don't think there's any precedent for the rights granted via American jurisprudence to be globally, generally applicable.