4 ms·
Sure. But let’s not pretend that it is cheap to do. All I’m saying that if you are cheering govt stepping into the equation then let’s have an honest discussion
by riantogo 8y ago
Sure. But let’s not pretend that it is cheap to do. All I’m saying that if you are cheering govt stepping into the equation then let’s have an honest discussion on who it hurts and who it benefits. Let’s take a stock of the impact to garage innovations. That is all.
- jwalton 8y agoAre you aware that it was illegal for you to collection email addresses from Canadians without their consent, due to [PIPEDA](https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/privacy-laws-in-canada/the-personal-information-protection-and-electronic-documents-act-pipeda/p_principle/principles/p_consent/ https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/privacy-laws-in-can...), long before the GDPR ever came into effect?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- sbuk 8y agoOK. Why is forcing people to consider the ethics of gathering data that have hither to proven to be lacking morally and ethically a bad thing? In terms of "impact to garage innovations", there shouldn't be any if there is nothing nefarious about it. The cost of designing and engineering software ethically is minimal.