3 ms·
The argument on both sides is around financial burden: * Pay more for delivery because not using Amazon Prime * Pay more to buy an Android phone When making
by zimbatm 8y ago
The argument on both sides is around financial burden:
* Pay more for delivery because not using Amazon Prime
* Pay more to buy an Android phone
When making this argument it's obvious that buying a new phone is much more expensive than Amazon Prime but this raises an interesting question; what is the financial threshold at which point one has to be considered a monopoly?
- _Mazza_ 8y agoMost people shop on multiple websites, most people don't carry around two phones.
- shawnz 8y agoMost people also don't pay for a subscription service that gives you cheaper prices. If you look specifically at Prime subscribers, I bet you'd find that they make efforts to do all their shopping through Amazon where possible.
- zimbatm 8y agoIn this context, the Phone is supposed to be on the same network for latency reasons. Having multiple phones at home is not a big issue.