4 ms·
I didn't say the law was bad, I was saying if it turns out to be, repealing it should be an option. Too often there is no going back from these things because i
by kodablah 8y ago
I didn't say the law was bad, I was saying if it turns out to be, repealing it should be an option. Too often there is no going back from these things because it's not considered an option. Instead only options like revolt, go elsewhere or use a VPN are presented.
Obviously the last incarnation of the GDPR didn't work for multiple reasons, the most oft-cited one being non-enforcement. Was the option to repeal and take other approaches to the problem considered? Nope...double down. Since people agree with the intent, the approach often appears above reproach.
- mrtksn 8y agoOf course, it is an option, the problem is that you claim not to be and you claim that "the EU and GDPR proponents' mindsets make a lot more sense" because I asked a question to emphasize the "test" on the EU citizens. I see you're in Texas. Don't worry too much about EU, we are doing fine. We will figure this thing out if it turns out to be more bad than good.