3 ms·
> "Eyetracking rejected for being ineffective, not for cost." Simply saying that it is ineffective is not an answer at all. Anyone with access to YouTube can s
by staunch 8y ago
> "Eyetracking rejected for being ineffective, not for cost."
Simply saying that it is ineffective is not an answer at all. Anyone with access to YouTube can see eye trackers working remarkably well.
Maybe he simply wasn't willing to disable Autopilot for users that could not be eye tracked accurately (glasses, etc), but that seems like a very bad reason. They should start with the ideal cases and add support for wearing glasses or low light over time.