4 ms·

This is painting the devil on the wall. First, out of all risks you face in life, "multiple armed or unarmed assailants who wish to do me grievous bodily harm"

by lutorm 8y ago

This is painting the devil on the wall. First, out of all risks you face in life, "multiple armed or unarmed assailants who wish to do me grievous bodily harm" is not really the one that you should be worrying about. Second, how would a handgun help you take on assailants armed with automatic weapons? So then you need an automatic weapon? But how will an automatic weapon help you take on assailants armed with hand grenades and RPGs? So then you need hand grenades and RPGS? Tanks? Fighter jets? Nuclear weapons? Your reasoning can be taken arbitrarily far. Do you take the same approach to all other, very unlikely, risks that you face in life?

15155 8y ago
> is not really the one that you should be worrying about. Not all of us are as privileged as you to live in a safe area. > Second, how would a handgun help you take on assailants armed with automatic weapons? So then you need an automatic weapon A handgun is good enough of an equalizer in the situations I am likely to face. For the relatively low cost, effort required, there's no substitute. > Do you take the same approach to all other, very unlikely, risks that you face in life? - How is it your place to determine the likelihood that I get into a violent altercation? - Why does my area now require some standard of "likelihood of violence" before I am allowed to protect myself? - How is it your place to make these risk-based judgment calls for me and others? The fact is: carrying a firearm takes ten seconds out of my day (to put on). Some might describe that as "living in fear," but I'll trade the ten seconds for the capabilities having said firearm confers. It's really not a big deal, despite what some might think. I'll also take the time to test and install fire extinguishers in my home.. or is my home catching fire a "very unlikely risk" I shouldn't be prepared for, too, in one's expert opinion?

by lutorm 8y ago

15155 8y ago

> is not really the one that you should be worrying about. Not all of us are as privileged as you to live in a safe area. > Second, how would a handgun help you take on assailants armed with automatic weapons? So then you need an automatic weapon A handgun is good enough of an equalizer in the situations I am likely to face. For the relatively low cost, effort required, there's no substitute. > Do you take the same approach to all other, very unlikely, risks that you face in life? - How is it your place to determine the likelihood that I get into a violent altercation? - Why does my area now require some standard of "likelihood of violence" before I am allowed to protect myself? - How is it your place to make these risk-based judgment calls for me and others? The fact is: carrying a firearm takes ten seconds out of my day (to put on). Some might describe that as "living in fear," but I'll trade the ten seconds for the capabilities having said firearm confers. It's really not a big deal, despite what some might think. I'll also take the time to test and install fire extinguishers in my home.. or is my home catching fire a "very unlikely risk" I shouldn't be prepared for, too, in one's expert opinion?