4 ms·
Grellas, would there have to be evidence that the participants were acting anti-competitively, or is being in the room enough? Arrington says that a few of the
by jon_dahl 16y ago
Grellas, would there have to be evidence that the participants were acting anti-competitively, or is being in the room enough? Arrington says that a few of the folks there were uncomfortable with what was going on, and were maybe there just to see what was happening.
- grellas 16y agoAssuming the meeting had an illegal purpose (which is a major assumption at this point), one might infer that anyone present was complicit in that illegal purpose. In my view, that by itself would not normally be enough to subject someone to liability, especially if the participant disclaims affiliation with the group and thereafter does not act in concert with it.