I didn't read very far but the article didn't seem to spend much time considering art theory, which seems odd when I would think that codifying those rules woul

I didn't read very far but the article didn't seem to spend much time considering art theory, which seems odd when I would think that codifying those rules would build better AI. This paper builds a mechanical assistant to the mechanical act of drawing, which, I guess, is good, but like you say that AI will never be able to get the work to 100%. Which means real artists won't have much more to be concerned about. Also that Marshall Mcluhan quote sounds more appropriate in a bitcoin thread. The world don't need a cult of A.I.