3 ms·
> So, outsiders can muckrake and as long as they are loud enough, someone will be removed? No . . . one has to actually violate the code of conduct to be remov
by asfasgasg 8y ago
> So, outsiders can muckrake and as long as they are loud enough, someone will be removed?
No . . . one has to actually violate the code of conduct to be removed. If there is no muck to be raked, then you should be in the clear.
- ThrustVectoring 8y ago"Harassment" is an open-ended enough term to make it nearly entirely up to the opinions of the muckrakers and arbitrators as to whether or not you violated the code of conduct. The sane response is to shut the hell up unless you have either tacit or explicit support from the ideologues that gravitate to the positions that let them judge you.
- Chaebixi 8y ago> If there is no muck to be raked, then you should be in the clear. This argument seems equivalent to the idea there's nothing to fear from surveillance if you have nothing to hide.
- asfasgasg 8y agoI suppose it bears some structural similarities. "You don't need to worry about X if Y." The X and Y are different, though, so as with many cases where the variables change, the relationship may or may not hold.
- falcolas 8y ago> Discussing potentially offensive or sensitive issues Sexism does exist, but incidents are often blown out of proportion to intent. Whelp, there goes my ability to contribute to Go code. :)