4 ms·
> A while ago I've written a series of articles about the Elm language and they are not that different from each other. The main difference IMO is that Elm is
by leshow 8y ago
> A while ago I've written a series of articles about the Elm language and they are not that different from each other.
The main difference IMO is that Elm is not really a general purpose language, you must use the Elm architecture to use it. It is only meant for frontend web applications.
- pyrale 8y agohttp://package.elm-lang.org/packages/chrilves/elm-io/1.2.1hile http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/chrilves/elm-io/1.2.1hi... elm is a frontend language, you are not forced to use tea. You can bypass the `program` entry point and use monadic-style command chaining for instance.
- leshow 8y agoSorry on the late reply, but your URL fails and I'm not sure I follow what you're talking about. I enjoyed Elm quite a bit @ version 0.16, then they got rid of signals and forced everyone to use TEA. To say that they aren't forcing you to use it isn't true. AFAIK, you can't even publish a module that interfaces with javascript without Evan's permission.