4 ms·
I would disagree with you slightly. Energy is not totally fungible. I can punch you in the face or shoot you with a gamma ray (edit: though of course, I would n
by throwaway5752 8y ago
I would disagree with you slightly. Energy is not totally fungible. I can punch you in the face or shoot you with a gamma ray (edit: though of course, I would never do either), and it would have very different effects, potentially. Same for a fastball vs a small caliber weapon. Heat, light, and kinetic energy are important distinctions - particularly when you have a bunch of 30k flywheels in close proximity and one of them catastrophically fails. Now, I know that's the first thing someone would think about deploying a bunch of them and they would take precautions. Li batteries are less kinetic and more thermal and that's a bit easier to manage/less likely to cascade.
I thought the trend in flywheels was magnetic suspension and removing mechanical linkages? Admittedly I haven't kept up.
- microcolonel 8y ago> that's a bit easier to manage/less likely to cascade. What gives you that impression? Seems to me that it explodes if you contain it, and if you don't contain it, it can spout jets of thermal energy at virtually any angle. With flywheels you need to arrest it in bulk heavy objects that don't tend to sustain fire. That seems a lot simpler to me. The bigger problems with flywheels are cost of manufacture and (depending on the technology used) efficiency for overnight storage. > I thought the trend in flywheels was magnetic suspension and removing mechanical linkages? Admittedly I haven't kept up. IIRC flywheels with limited motion gimbals (to reduce the tolerances on the wheel) are becoming more popular, still magnetic bearings.
- throwaway5752 8y agoWhat gives you that impression? Insulation is cheap, effective, and very compact. And it's easy to transfer heat quickly, also (either via injecting lots of cold extinguisher or flush lots of hot oxidizing gas)? Cool, thanks for the update on flywheels. I ... am not trying to create a false dilemna, here. Fuel cells for stranded methane deposits are great. Flywheels have outstanding responsiveness and energy density. Li / compressed air / pumped water et al scale well. They all fit into a more resilient grid storage strategy that permits a transition to periodic sources of input from non-renewable base load.
- wbl 8y agoExcept we've had a carbon free baseload tech for decades now.
- throwaway5752 8y agoIt's kind of bizarre how nuclear had achieved a sort of counterculture renaissance. It has many, many drawbacks too numerous to go into here that are technical and sociological in nature. And anyway, you tried to be too clever. I said "non-renewable" and not "carbon free" just to avoid this conversation. Unless you can start synthesizing utility grade quantities of well-behaved fissile material at a net energy surplus then it's not renewable even if we have decades/centuries of supply.
- paulmd 8y ago> Unless you can start synthesizing utility grade quantities of well-behaved fissile material at a net energy surplus then it's not renewable even if we have decades/centuries of supply. Someday, even the Sun will run out of fuel. In the long run, we are all dead - unless someone figures out how to reverse entropy. http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html
- throwaway5752 8y agoIf you listen very hard, you can hear my eyes rolling through your computer. But I enjoyed reading the story and begrudgingly admire your pedantry on the matter!
- paulmd 8y agoSome animes have theorized a different method for reversing entropy. Like nuclear fission, we may be able to release a tremendous amount of energy by smashing the dreams of young girls and harnessing the power of their tears. https://wiki.puella-magi.net/Thermodynamics https://wiki.puella-magi.net/Thermodynamics