4 ms·

Notice, it says he was employee #23. I think Google's standards have risen since then, and even if they make the odd exception here and there, betting on being

by eric9 16y ago

Notice, it says he was employee #23. I think Google's standards have risen since then, and even if they make the odd exception here and there, betting on being such an exception seems questionable.

mechanical_fish 16y ago
Why, I do believe my beloved alma mater has been slandered! I need to recruit Buchheit and Eric Meyer and the ghost of A.A. Michaelson and Donald freaking Knuth and come kick your butt! ;) No, seriously: It doesn't matter. People manage to succeed with pitiful little CWRU degrees like my own. And, obviously, many of the most successful people in the industry never went to college at all. I have heard the occasional rumor that Google is obsessed with academic credentials. If true, that is more of a problem for them than for you.
- eric9 16y ago
  I wasn't bashing CW, just pointing out that it was easier to get hired at Google in the early days than it is now, and picking out early hires who didn't go to Stanford isn't really representative of their current hiring practices and isn't something you should count on happening to you.
mkramlich 16y ago
> I think Google's standards have risen since [...] ... since hiring the guy that went on to create Gmail! Yes, this reminds me of what tends to happen as companies get larger: they add more processes and "standards" and management and therefore increasingly lose out on the kinds of opportunities and people they used to be able to get. Granted, Google stands out as seeming to do pretty well fighting against it, staying fairly "agile" for it's size and age. But if your company reaches the point where it cares more about what university you attended rather than your intellectual qualities and accomplishments, you're heading in a bad direction.
jon_dahl 16y ago
(Not sure if this is a joke, so I'm not going to vote up or down. I hope it's a joke.)

by eric9 16y ago

Notice, it says he was employee #23. I think Google's standards have risen since then, and even if they make the odd exception here and there, betting on being such an exception seems questionable.

mechanical_fish 16y ago

Why, I do believe my beloved alma mater has been slandered! I need to recruit Buchheit and Eric Meyer and the ghost of A.A. Michaelson and Donald freaking Knuth and come kick your butt! ;) No, seriously: It doesn't matter. People manage to succeed with pitiful little CWRU degrees like my own. And, obviously, many of the most successful people in the industry never went to college at all. I have heard the occasional rumor that Google is obsessed with academic credentials. If true, that is more of a problem for them than for you.

eric9 16y ago
I wasn't bashing CW, just pointing out that it was easier to get hired at Google in the early days than it is now, and picking out early hires who didn't go to Stanford isn't really representative of their current hiring practices and isn't something you should count on happening to you.

mkramlich 16y ago

> I think Google's standards have risen since [...] ... since hiring the guy that went on to create Gmail! Yes, this reminds me of what tends to happen as companies get larger: they add more processes and "standards" and management and therefore increasingly lose out on the kinds of opportunities and people they used to be able to get. Granted, Google stands out as seeming to do pretty well fighting against it, staying fairly "agile" for it's size and age. But if your company reaches the point where it cares more about what university you attended rather than your intellectual qualities and accomplishments, you're heading in a bad direction.

jon_dahl 16y ago

(Not sure if this is a joke, so I'm not going to vote up or down. I hope it's a joke.)