4 ms·
> Shouldn't it be easy for the radar to detect if there are stopped obstacles ahead? No. It's very difficult. Radar reflects off of everything. The only way to
by drunken-serval 8y ago
> Shouldn't it be easy for the radar to detect if there are stopped obstacles ahead?
No. It's very difficult. Radar reflects off of everything. The only way to get a useful signal is to look for things that are moving at a different speed than you, like something moving relative to the road. So the radar software filters out all signals that have the same speed at the road ahead.
This means the radar won't see anything stopped on the road, because it's filtering out a huge number of returns from the road. This gets even worse because Radar reflects very differently based off the material. It goes right through plastic, water (humans) absorb it.
Even if you could try to read through the noise of the road, Radar doesn't have enough resolution to tell the difference between the road going uphill and a stopped firetruck.
- confiscate 8y agoThanks for the explanation. "radar won't see anything stopped on the road, because it's filtering out a huge number of returns from the road" what does that mean? sorry i am still confused. Isn't the whole point of radar to detect objects around you? It shouldn't matter if the object is in the road ahead, or on the side of the road, right? Because they are all obstacles that the car should avoid, no? Like, a stopped car in front of you, vs a tree next to you on the side of the road, are both things the software should avoid, and NOT filter out, right?