4 ms·
> Safety officials cited Mark III Construction – and not Tesla – with violations following the accident. However, Nguyen’s suit states that Tesla “controlled” t
by Natsu 8y ago
> Safety officials cited Mark III Construction – and not Tesla – with violations following the accident. However, Nguyen’s suit states that Tesla “controlled” the contractor and safety on the worksite.
Seems like a bad contractor ignored safety and now they're blaming Tesla. It will be interesting to see who the court finds responsible here.
- toomanybeersies 8y agoI'm not sure how it works in the USA, but I'm fairly sure that the way it works where I'm from is that the Tesla should be at fault too, because it happened on their worksite.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Natsu 8y agoIt will likely depend on a lot of complex legal factors, including what Tesla knew or should have known. I expect the contractor would pretty clearly be on the hook here, though, both to this man and to Tesla. Sending an untrained man with no safety gear into a situation like that is absurd.