3 ms·
Both interface and performance actually. I have a library of about 1000+ songs and it barely takes anymore than 130 mb of RAM for me. This is actually better th
by quantummkv 8y ago
Both interface and performance actually. I have a library of about 1000+ songs and it barely takes anymore than 130 mb of RAM for me. This is actually better than some native c# music players that I used before I made this. And CPU usage is very light.
- pwg 8y agoMy how resource consumption expectations have changed. This player: http://gqmpeg.sourceforge.net/mpeg-over.html http://gqmpeg.sourceforge.net/mpeg-over.html With a library of 5,011 songs. Consumes 18 mb. Since it uses the CLI mpg123 binary to actually play the songs, when playing the child mpg123 process uses up another 3 mb. So take your pick, 18 mb or 21 mb. Much lower resource usage either way.