Looks like the judge just decided "oh, it's against Trump? I hate Trump, so whatever it is I am on the plaintiff's side". We should expect better from judges. 1

Looks like the judge just decided "oh, it's against Trump? I hate Trump, so whatever it is I am on the plaintiff's side". We should expect better from judges. 1st amendment has nothing to do with being able to annoy Trump via his personal Twitter account. And it is fascinating how Twitter, Facebook etc. are private companies with no obligations when it is convenient to censor, but suddenly turn into "public forum" when other convenience demands it.