Re: you are not doing credit to the many physicists and science communicators who thoroughly explained why this was quackery To my knowledge, general intent to

Re: you are not doing credit to the many physicists and science communicators who thoroughly explained why this was quackery To my knowledge, general intent to deceive was NEVER proven. Or are you using a different definition of "quackery"? Yes, it appeared to violate known physical laws, but it was still possible that A) physicists missed a curious aspect of current models, or B) the existing models of physics are wrong or need tuning. It happens. Not common, but it happens.