4 ms·
If it had been thoroughly explained then there wouldn't have been anomalous experimental results. I agree that it's rather likely that we're seeing experimenta
by dwringer 8y ago
If it had been thoroughly explained then there wouldn't have been anomalous experimental results. I agree that it's rather likely that we're seeing experimental artefacts rather than new unexplored areas of physical law, but we must scientifically explain the results or else be very cautious, in general, when declaring something to be impossible. As the joke goes, that is well known to be the surest way in science to eventually be proven wrong. Even if it turns out these pseudoscientific dismissals were reaching the correct conclusion; well, as they say, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
- pixelcloud 8y agoIt find it super funny how it was a cable related issue just like this famous one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neutrino_anomaly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neutrino_ano...
- scott_s 8y agoI'm not claiming impossible. I'm claiming so unlikely that it's not worth our attention. The problem is that we live in a world of people trying to fool us. People trying to actively undermine the scientific process. There is a long history of charlatans claiming free energy; it's not feasible for us to entertain all of their claims.