> You're right, it may not have been proven but based on the amount of coverage and writing on it, there must be some truth behind it. Seems like a bad way to

> You're right, it may not have been proven but based on the amount of coverage and writing on it, there must be some truth behind it. Seems like a bad way to determine the truth. But either way, even if the crack epidemic was simply a result of the material conditions in the communities it effected, the government is culpable, though perhaps in a somewhat more limited way