4 ms·
You're right, it may not have been proven but based on the amount of coverage and writing on it, there must be some truth behind it. Do you really think these p
by deft 8y ago
You're right, it may not have been proven but based on the amount of coverage and writing on it, there must be some truth behind it. Do you really think these people decided to make it up? And regardless of whether they smuggled the drugs, they knowingly supported the people doing it.
Also, I haven't downvoted you and I'm quite confused by the votes on my original comment. Went straight into the negatives and now it's back up.
- reaperducer 8y ago>based on the amount of coverage and writing on it, there must be some truth behind it See also: U.F.O.'s, Kennedy Assassination, Illuminati, etc...
- uxp100 8y ago> You're right, it may not have been proven but based on the amount of coverage and writing on it, there must be some truth behind it. Seems like a bad way to determine the truth. But either way, even if the crack epidemic was simply a result of the material conditions in the communities it effected, the government is culpable, though perhaps in a somewhat more limited way
- Chaebixi 8y ago> You're right, it may not have been proven but based on the amount of coverage and writing on it, there must be some truth behind it. There has also been lots of coverage of Obama not being a natural born American, and thus an illegitimate president. Do you think that means "there must be some truth behind it?" The kind of thinking you displayed in your comment leads to damaging nonsense like birther-ism. Don't go there.