> The vast majority of US citizens don't use twitter and a sizable portion don't even have access to a twitter-capable device. If you don't like that, consider

> The vast majority of US citizens don't use twitter and a sizable portion don't even have access to a twitter-capable device. If you don't like that, consider taking that up with the Trump Administration. If his administration wants to use a medium that most people don't/won't/can't access, that kinda reflects on Trump. If you are down with that, cool. But the responsibility lies 100% with him. This ruling says that if he insists on using twitter to make his policy statements, than he can't block people. I dunno what more to say. Again. This seems like pretty straightforward stuff to me. PS: I'm positive that somewhere down in the bowels of some federal government agency, somebody, somewhere, is trying to solve your concern. Probably by snapshotting his tweets and recording them in a more durable, accessable medium. (or god forbid printing them / saving them to PDF, etc). I also promise you tens of thousands of private citizens and journalists are doing the same thing.