5 ms·
Yeah, and now you can't respond to anything he says. You've had your voice taken away. The only way back into the conversation is to create a new Twitter acco
by RIMR 8y ago
Yeah, and now you can't respond to anything he says. You've had your voice taken away. The only way back into the conversation is to create a new Twitter account (in violation of the Twitter TOS).
And if you log back in with the blocked account, and try to tweet @realDonaldTrump, it will prevent you from posting because he blocked you, preventing you from using his Twitter handle in any way.
You also cannot retweet him anymore, which is a common way of publicly condemning the things he says.
In the hands of the President, the block feature is a powerful censorship tool.
- PurpleBoxDragon 8y ago>Yeah, and now you can't respond to anything he says. You've had your voice taken away. The only way back into the conversation is to create a new Twitter account (in violation of the Twitter TOS). When Trump uses his phone to talk to some people but doesn't take my call, is my voice taken away?
- beefield 8y agoSounds to me more like Trump can set up so that your phone calls are dropped every time you mention Trump in your conversation.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- xienze 8y ago> Yeah, and now you can't respond to anything he says. You've had your voice taken away. Not really. I mean, what did we do before Twitter came along?
- daveguy 8y agoBefore Twitter came along the president didn't have the legal ability to prevent you from criticizing him in any other venue either.
- zaroth 8y agoTrump removed plenty of hecklers from his campaign events.
- daveguy 8y agoGood point. If critical tweets kept him from giving his message then I expect the judge would have ruled differently.
- enraged_camel 8y agoHe had not been elected yet. The moment he did, things changed.
- zaroth 8y agoCertainly he continues to remove hecklers from his campaign events. The distinction is a campaign event isn’t a “public forum”.
- dragonwriter 8y agoCampaign events are generally not public forums, even if the candidate happens to also be an incumbent public official. For a federal official (and similar laws exist for state government), if the nexus with official government affairs required to make a public forum existed with a campaign event, that’d probably violate the Hatch Act separately from whether any violation of public forum law occurred.