5 ms·
You have no evidence to support this.
by facetube 8y ago
You have no evidence to support this.
- cpncrunch 8y agoNo, but there is no evidence to support the sonic weapon hypothesis either, and a psychiatric explanation does fit the facts a lot better. Why would a single person in the Chinese embassy suffer the symptoms for over a year, while no other employees experienced it?
- facetube 8y agoYou made a claim. Support it or withdraw it.
- cpncrunch 8y agoThe article made a claim. Im pointing out that it doesnt fit the given data.
- facetube 8y agoWhy do you believe this? Cite evidence. You're certainly doing no better than the article here.
- cpncrunch 8y agoEvidence for what? The article gives evidence that it just happened to one person. I'm using logic to show that that doesn't fit the model of a sonic weapon. Here is some evidence linking tinnitus to psychiatric disorders: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16844885 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16844885 "A close association between tinnitus and psychiatric disorders has been demonstrated".
- facetube 8y agoThat's great, but you alleged this was the cause of a specific person's symptoms. Your citation does not support your claim – it's circumstantial and speculative.
- cpncrunch 8y ago>it's circumstantial and speculative So is the original allegation in the article. I'm saying that psychiatric explanation fits the facts better. If you have any evidence to the contrary, feel free to post it... Do you have something against a psychiatric explanation?