4 ms·
That’s the flip side of term limits. Doesn’t mean the advantage isn’t worth it When they say “weakening” that seems like an emotionally overloaded choice picke
by lele92n 8y ago
That’s the flip side of term limits. Doesn’t mean the advantage isn’t worth it
When they say “weakening” that seems like an emotionally overloaded choice picked for cultural resonance.
Is it really a weakening or just a new model to acclimate to and tweak as needed to ensure outcomes?
Why is giving any ground or change always coming along with “we won’t be strong in the same way!” rhetoric
Duh but that doesn’t negate the argument for change given other data over here
We’ve yet to discover a unified theory of reality
I highly doubt our system of social governance has found an equivalent
It has to change. It will change if history is any indicator
Better to have the conversations ourselves then leave it up to experts across the world
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]