3 ms·
> The substance is that I actually use a security feature that Apple has implemented and it makes my device more secure. You're missing the point entirely. I s
by hungerstrike 8y ago
> The substance is that I actually use a security feature that Apple has implemented and it makes my device more secure.
You're missing the point entirely. I said that Apple doesn't really care if you're actually secure or not...and your response to that is essentially "well, I feel safe". That says nothing about Apples motivations which is what my assumption centers around.
> If the actions you take to make it look like you care about security also happen to make you more secure, is it security theater?
And? Again, you're not speaking to motivation at all, which are the target of my assumptions. I can assume anything I want about Apples motivations based on my view of their history and there isn't much you can do to prove or disprove that, which makes your own complaint about my assumptions rather ridiculous. It's a fucking opinion...get over it!
> Can a company do something that both makes them look good in the public eye and be good for their users? I think they can.
Apparently it's good for some users and not so good for others as in the case of this posters story as well as my own.