3 ms·
It would literally take me a single Ctrl+F though the codebase to see every line of code that uses CustomerID. Does it not for you? Ah right, you're making a p
by heavenlyblue 8y ago
It would literally take me a single Ctrl+F though the codebase to see every line of code that uses CustomerID.
Does it not for you? Ah right, you're making a point about how slow the progress will be if we do not allow the small business owners to build their half-baked solutions.
I am pretty sure Romans once had the same issue with the bridge builders.
- drstewart 8y ago>It would literally take me a single Ctrl+F though the codebase to see every line of code that uses CustomerID. Most real world applications aren't that simple unfortunately. You can Ctrl+F all you want, but that won't show you the logging that automatically logs parameters from requests that include customerID or the reports based on DB replications or ETL.
- heavenlyblue 8y agoWell, then remove all of the other data associated with the customer. CustomerID then is then going to be irrelevant anyway. But frankly, all of your points are equally invalid. Replications are a copy. Replace values in replications with faux values if that's required. ETL? Absolutely the same. Logs? sed s/UserID/FauxUserID. You're operating a semi-garage business if it's so hard to comply with GDPR. Data does not belong to you anymore, and you've had a few years to make sure you complied.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- s73v3r_ 8y agoThat's only because the people building them haven't cared about it. Now, hopefully, people will care about it.
- dominotw 8y agook? Not sure what you are trying to say with ctrl+F. Don't care for your dumbass comment about some small business thing.