5 ms·
This doesn't automatically mean GANs can outpace any detection method.
by romaniv 8y ago
This doesn't automatically mean GANs can outpace any detection method.
- smallnamespace 8y agoIf the detection methods are publicly available, then you simply incorporate the detection method in your training regimen. Effective detection methods may end up being closely guarded secrets.
- GunwaleHamilton 8y agoWhich means we would have to rely on an "Authority" who cannot be independently verified, because we do not know the secret sauce they are using.
- londons_explore 8y agoThey need to be publicly available and differentiable to be able to use as an opponent for a GAN. Pretty much nothing except other neural networks are differentiable, unless you put effort into designing them to be.
- supermdguy 8y agoIt's feasible to design a reinforcement learning based network that uses output from a non-differentiable deepfake detector as a component of the loss function.
- mikec3010 8y agoAnd can you imagine the impact of false positives? Prosecutor has the perp on video committing a heinous offense but it's still insufficient evidence because of a software bug.
- jessaustin 8y agoWe can dream of juries that wise... haven't seen one yet though have we?
- Cacti 8y agoFurthermore, if the Generator outpaces the Discriminator by too much then the generator stops learning, or, worse, degenerates into mode collapse. Generators and Discriminators have to be close to each other in capability for either to get anywhere.