4 ms·
FWIW, the anti-Kaspersky train has been rolling for over three years. Since the time that Kaspersky revealed (after Symantec) global co-ordinated state sponsor
by peterwwillis 8y ago
FWIW, the anti-Kaspersky train has been rolling for over three years.
Since the time that Kaspersky revealed (after Symantec) global co-ordinated state sponsored malware programs such as Reign, created by the NSA and GCHQ. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/05/regin_kaspersky/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/05/regin_kaspersky/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regin_(malware) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regin_(malware)
Or the time that Kaspersky publicly humiliated the NSA by revealing their hacking of hard drive firmware. https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/2/17/1364910/-Breaking-Kaspersky-Exposes-NSA-s-Worldwide-Backdoor-Hacking-of-Virtually-All-Hard-Drive-Firmware https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/2/17/1364910/-Breaking... https://www.scmagazineuk.com/is-nsa-worlds-most-advanced-threat-actor-revealed-by-kaspersky/article/537596/ https://www.scmagazineuk.com/is-nsa-worlds-most-advanced-thr...
Since then, congressional hearings, committees, and US intel agencies' warnings of "security threats" from Kaspersky had been rolling out with regular frequency. Last year's ban was just a culmination of other efforts already underway.
Kaspersky's role of tracking nation-state malware inflitrations gives them a position as a quasi-intelligence agency. US intelligence agencies hate Kaspersky because they out every program the US has going on, and because they operate out of Moscow.
Literally every US intelligence agency has testified before Congress about how they specifically don't trust Kaspersky. https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/07/05/535651597/congress-casts-a-suspicious-eye-on-russias-kaspersky-lab https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/07/05/535651597/... So the US and its allies infiltrated their network and reverse engineered its software in order to find whatever dirt they could. https://www.observeit.com/blog/kaspersky-lab-nation-state-attack/ https://www.observeit.com/blog/kaspersky-lab-nation-state-at... https://theintercept.com/2015/06/22/nsa-gchq-targeted-kaspersky/ https://theintercept.com/2015/06/22/nsa-gchq-targeted-kasper...
The information they have on global intelligence operations, their location outside of an ally's control, their insistence on embarrassing nation states' covert operations and exploits, and the fact that their software isn't the most secure (https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/09/23/google-ormandy-finds-kaspersky-0days/#2263a6b65493 https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/09/23/googl...) has given the US government enough reason to want them out of their infrastructure. It's just politically untenable.
- linkregister 8y agoWhat makes you think the NSA employees felt humiliated? Maybe they were proud that their work was publicly recognized. Higher-ups understandably felt frustration that they needed to replace the program, but what makes you think that the employees didn't already anticipate that exploits and campaigns would get burned? Is there a difference between a vendor issuing a patch or an organization's security response team cutting off access, and a anti-malware company doing its job to research campaigns?
- linkregister 8y ago* > Basically, Kaspersky's role of tracking nation-state malware inflitrations gives them a position as a quasi-intelligence agency. The US government didn't like that, because they constantly out the various programs going on, and because they operate out of Moscow. So the US and/or its allies infiltrated their network and reverse engineered its software in order to find whatever dirt they could. https://www.observeit.com/blog/kaspersky-lab-nation-state-attack/ https://www.observeit.com/blog/kaspersky-lab-nation-state-at... https://theintercept.com/2015/06/22/nsa-gchq-targeted-kaspersky/* https://theintercept.com/2015/06/22/nsa-gchq-targeted-kasper... Is revenge the only motive to do this, if indeed it was the NSA (it's likely it is)? Wasn't there an allegation that Kaspersky software had exfiltrated NSA employees' and contractors inappropriately-stored classified material? Or wouldn't it makes sense for the NSA, an intelligence agency, to spy on a foreign company with good access to information about foreign officials?
- peterwwillis 8y ago