3 ms·
Sure, they advance the interests of over-represented groups at the expense of underrepresented groups. This includes transexual students, presumably.
by creaghpatr 8y ago
Sure, they advance the interests of over-represented groups at the expense of underrepresented groups. This includes transexual students, presumably.
- Nasrudith 8y agoDepends on if they are by sex, gender, or both. Gender is a social construct as opposed to sex although they have been strongly linked usually - although not without exceptions even in the west. Albanian sworn virgins for one were considered male in gender. Surprisingly some womens' colleges accept FtM students, some accept MtF students, and others accept both or neither. The first seems odd but is actually pretty historically justifiable in the number of women known to make history by disguising as men. Whether they did so for sake of opportunity or gender identity and how much the two overlapped in the context of the time ("I am a doctor above all else but women cannot be doctors...") is an interesting concept to explore. Doing so couls be said to honor their legacy. The second is of course justifiable as supporting the gender.