5 ms·
Then you don't understand that when the user is unaware of such feature and can't easily opt in/out, then it's an anti-feature, because sometimes not getting lo
by seba_dos1 8y ago
Then you don't understand that when the user is unaware of such feature and can't easily opt in/out, then it's an anti-feature, because sometimes not getting locked out from your own device is way more important than data being safe.
- csomar 8y agoI disagree. If the user doesn’t understand the technicalities, then, I argue that Apple should take control. The user might think that access is more important until the case where you have sensitive data (like intimate photos) at the wrong hands. Apple picks to destory the data of all users. It annoys the majority but protect the minority which has sensitive information. Also users underestimate the sensititivty of their data until the hammer hits.
- wolfgke 8y ago> I disagree. If the user doesn’t understand the technicalities, then, I argue that Apple should take control. I disagree: If the user doesn’t understand the technicalities, then I argue that the device is not for them.
- RugnirViking 8y agoThere are plenty of other operating systems and devices which allow for users to make the choice. For example, I know many people myself included who make the choice to keep their android device with no password at all.