3 ms·
What I am saying is meant in the context of the non-steady-state collapsing sphere, not the steady-state Schwarzschild black hole. I never doubted the validity
by namibj 8y ago
What I am saying is meant in the context of the non-steady-state collapsing sphere, not the steady-state Schwarzschild black hole.
I never doubted the validity of these equations, I just doubted them to accurately describe reality, as they neglect an explanation why the collapsing star should ever reach a steady state. If you have such an explanation, please tell me, I'm interested.
- pdonis 8y ago> What I am saying is meant in the context of the non-steady-state collapsing sphere That doesn't change my comment. The spacetime exterior to the collapsing sphere is still Schwarzschild, by Birkhoff's Theorem, and therefore has the same properties as the spacetime around a steady-state black hole. > they neglect an explanation why the collapsing star should ever reach a steady state Are you familiar with the "no hair" theorems for black holes? They are the explanation.
- namibj 8y agoIt's been a while since I was that deep in this, so I can't counter on a technical level. I won't have time to look the details up, at least in the near future.