3 ms·
Cleanroom has a lot of evidence that process (especially around code inspection/review) does improve quality more than TDD or other methods of detailed design,
by codemac 8y ago
Cleanroom has a lot of evidence that process (especially around code inspection/review) does improve quality more than TDD or other methods of detailed design, most people are just unwilling to take the time for detailed process for quality IMO.
- crdoconnor 8y agoThat's frequently a reasonable trade off. A lot of businesses need a proof of concept to test product market fit. IMHO TDD can often be a massive waste of time if that is the case. There's weirdly not a lot of good advice out there on sensible steps to reasonably transform a rushed proof of concept in to a production quality app. Mostly it all starts with the assumption that you're building something from scratch.
- codemac 8y ago> There's weirdly not a lot of good advice out there on sensible steps to reasonably transform a rushed proof of concept in to a production quality app. Mostly it all starts with the assumption that you're building something from scratch. Cleanroom is actually completely reasonable for this - what you must accept is that transforming a rushed proof concept into a production quality application is starting from scratch in terms of ascii in github. It's the experience of those that worked on it that is valuable to save.