I'm not so sure: the Wikipedia article quotes Justice Sotomayor: > "More fundamentally, it may be necessary to reconsider the premise that an individual has no

I'm not so sure: the Wikipedia article quotes Justice Sotomayor: > "More fundamentally, it may be necessary to reconsider the premise that an individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information voluntarily disclosed to third parties. This approach is ill suited to the digital age, in which people reveal a great deal of information about themselves to third parties in the course of carrying out mundane tasks." Gorsuch may also be on board: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/11/in_carpenter_v_united_states_neil_gorsuch_showed_his_independent_streak.html http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudenc... > [Gorsuch] appeared eager to apply originalist principles to contemporary technology in a way that shields cellphone users from law enforcement overreach. Indeed, Gorsuch seems poised to build upon the jurisprudence of his predecessor, Justice Antonin Scalia, to establish real constitutional limits on the government’s ability to track our movements through our mobile devices.