2 ms·

It's a picture of a woman. How do you know it's Merkel? How do you know it's even a Stasi agent? Where is your credible proof? This is all idle speculation.

jk2323 8y ago
"It's a picture of a woman." Yes. And Merkel has forbidden the publication of exactly this picture, as you can read in the Spiegel article (a major German left wing magazine). Now you have to do some mental acrobatics, but I try to spell it out for you: YOU CAN ONLY CLAIM PRIVACY RIGHTS ON YOUR OWN PICTURE. Is this so hard to understand? The picture was taken in front of the house of dissident Havelman. This fact is not disputed by Merkel. I checked online, I think from Berlin Alexanderplatz it takes 2 or 3 hours to go to his former house by public transport. He lived here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Burgwallstraße,+15537+Grünheide+(Mark),+Germany/@52.4348348,13.8374697,17z https://www.google.com/maps/place/Burgwallstraße,+15537+Grün... The street was heavily guarded, no one could just "walk by there by chance". SO WTF was she doing there? > How do you know it's Merkel? See above. > How do you know it's even a Stasi agent? Supposedly her agent name was "IM Erika" > Where is your credible proof? This is all idle speculation. Yes. Because even that Merkel did not deny that this picture is showing her and that she forbid the publication is "idle speculation that it is here" for you. A fact, published by the major German news magazine. You can even buy a T-Shirt :-) https://www.amazon.com/Federal-Chancellor-Government-Treason-Protest/dp/B01MYOPW8I https://www.amazon.com/Federal-Chancellor-Government-Treason...
- KozmoNau7 8y ago
  You don't have any proof. All you have are a collection of random pieces of supposed "evidence", and you're making significant leaps to desperately connect them. This, and the fact that you insist on calling Merkel left wing, despite proof to the contrary, only supports the conclusion that you are completely off your rocker.

jk2323 8y ago

"It's a picture of a woman." Yes. And Merkel has forbidden the publication of exactly this picture, as you can read in the Spiegel article (a major German left wing magazine). Now you have to do some mental acrobatics, but I try to spell it out for you: YOU CAN ONLY CLAIM PRIVACY RIGHTS ON YOUR OWN PICTURE. Is this so hard to understand? The picture was taken in front of the house of dissident Havelman. This fact is not disputed by Merkel. I checked online, I think from Berlin Alexanderplatz it takes 2 or 3 hours to go to his former house by public transport. He lived here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Burgwallstraße,+15537+Grünheide+(Mark),+Germany/@52.4348348,13.8374697,17z https://www.google.com/maps/place/Burgwallstraße,+15537+Grün... The street was heavily guarded, no one could just "walk by there by chance". SO WTF was she doing there? > How do you know it's Merkel? See above. > How do you know it's even a Stasi agent? Supposedly her agent name was "IM Erika" > Where is your credible proof? This is all idle speculation. Yes. Because even that Merkel did not deny that this picture is showing her and that she forbid the publication is "idle speculation that it is here" for you. A fact, published by the major German news magazine. You can even buy a T-Shirt :-) https://www.amazon.com/Federal-Chancellor-Government-Treason-Protest/dp/B01MYOPW8I https://www.amazon.com/Federal-Chancellor-Government-Treason...

KozmoNau7 8y ago
You don't have any proof. All you have are a collection of random pieces of supposed "evidence", and you're making significant leaps to desperately connect them. This, and the fact that you insist on calling Merkel left wing, despite proof to the contrary, only supports the conclusion that you are completely off your rocker.