4 ms·
I think the sage advice is to find someone who's doing what you do, but is ahead of you on the roadmap (but not too far ahead, perhaps). How do you do that? B
by pm 8y ago
I think the sage advice is to find someone who's doing what you do, but is ahead of you on the roadmap (but not too far ahead, perhaps). How do you do that?
Be experienced enough to know enough people in your field.
Find a contact channel and ask someone you respect. If that fails, ask someone you've already known and respected for a long time. If you can't or won't do that, then you should go it alone. You don't need mentors to succeed.
I find that I know enough people after working for more than a decade that my mentors have become the people I already ask for advice, so making it official was a minor step.
To address your specific requests:
1. Knowing yourself well enough means knowing your blind spots. Anything you dismiss without question is a blind spot. Have mentors who cover them. I have robust conversations with all my mentors, and they always give me pause for thought.
2. Asking for time means you need to focus on what you're asking of them. Mentors are there to advise, not make the decisions for you, or finance your endeavour (unless they already do). Ask politely and they'll say yes.
3. Well-framed questions help, but I find that I won't know the questions to ask until I've experienced something unexpected. Also, sometimes I find some of the best conversations come out of asking open-ended questions. I think there's a time for both.
As to my situation: I've asked mentorship from people younger and older. I've asked friends and acquaintances; some I know well, some I don't. However, they are all willing to be honest. It's necessary that we disagree on some things.
My blind spots are things such as raising money vs. bootstrapping (bootstrapping all the way!); revenue from products and services vs. revenue through finance or advertising (I believe revenue should come from creating material value, not increasing it through financial vehicles); cryptocurrency as a business model (I find few projects are genuinely useful). If the opposite of my belief happens to be useful, then it helps to have someone who understands it.
- mkirklions 8y ago> (I find few projects are genuinely useful). basically my thought since I found out most of these crypto projects are trying to solve problems that are already done centralized. (like logistics) Seeing stuff like this is why I only believe Crypto is going to be used as a Currency and not for apps.
- sumedh 8y ago> Ask politely and they'll say yes. Or you can take Warren Buffett's approach and keep on bugging your mentor, even be ready to work for free so that you get to work with your mentor.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoWorking for free devalues the entire profession, and disrespects us all. It reenforces the idea that people should have to work for free to "prove themselves", which shuts things out to only those who can afford to work for free (people from rich families, people who don't have a family to support)
- eyepulp 8y agoWithout context, working for free requires careful thought. But in the context of this conversation "free" means without monetary compensation, but you're still receiving the benefit of the mentorship (and thus not free). TLDR; No one's advocating working for free. The Warren Buffett approach is "trade money for time with a good mentor."
- s73v3r_ 8y agoThe person above literally said "work for free". Those were the exact words said. And I don't know about you, but I can't buy food or pay rent with "time from a good mentor."
- eyepulp 8y agoI think you're missing the point, but maybe I'm missing yours. Perhaps I could use some mentorship from you. =)
- s73v3r_ 8y agoI'm saying that, when working for free becomes the norm to advance, the only people that can do so are those who can afford to work for free. If you're someone who isn't already rich, or someone who doesn't come from a wealthy family, you can't afford to work for free. You still have to pay for rent and food.