> when in reality it is, "slow moving, traditional, and (frequently) inefficient." Since you just moved here, I would also consider the "whys" of those proble

> when in reality it is, "slow moving, traditional, and (frequently) inefficient." Since you just moved here, I would also consider the "whys" of those problems you see. Approaches are probably different from what you're used to elsewhere, but that doesn't necessarily make them inefficient or bad -- just different from what you're used to.