3 ms·
I understand the argument: they're trying to draw a line between ordinary union activity and political speech. But a lot of people don't think such a line is po
by jeffdavis 8y ago
I understand the argument: they're trying to draw a line between ordinary union activity and political speech. But a lot of people don't think such a line is possible.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoA company of any decent size engages in political speech constantly, much of which many of their employees might disagree with. Why is it ok for the company to do so, but not the employees banded together?