4 ms·

>A lot of the change is attributable to breaking with tradition. Is it? I thought it was due to modern medicine. Do you have a reference?

• bunderbunder 8y ago
  Modern medicine is a result of one of those breaks with tradition - specifically, a change in mindset from using received wisdom such as, "this is how we've always done it" to a more experimental, evidence-based approach to deciding how to do things. In the spirit of modern medicine, I'd suggest that that article was chock full of stats that should get much higher billing than a line of reasoning that's of a kind with one of the main ones that people use to promote acupuncture.
  • faitswulff 8y ago
    My line of reasoning was "it must have been within acceptable ranges of risk because otherwise the species would be extinct or doing something differently," not a pure appeal to tradition. The statistics back this up, hence my mentioning them first.
    • mmt 8y ago
      I think it's a bit extreme to suggest that the standard for an acceptable range of risk is anything that doesn't cause our species to go extinct. We tend to put a greater value on human life than that, even (or especially), traditionally.