It will be interesting to see how many of the items on that list the plaintiffs can prove in a court of law, as such proof would be necessary to claim of damage

It will be interesting to see how many of the items on that list the plaintiffs can prove in a court of law, as such proof would be necessary to claim of damages... Well, in US law at least, as I understand it. I'm a lot less familiar with the UK. But even under a civil-court "preponderance of evidence" standard, wouldn't you have to prove some material harm to be eligible for damages (not just the potential of the data perhaps maybe being misused possibly)?