4 ms·
Kalman filters are wonderful things and great for keeping track of where other things are in relation to yourself. But for localizing my robot I'd generally us
by Symmetry 8y ago
Kalman filters are wonderful things and great for keeping track of where other things are in relation to yourself. But for localizing my robot I'd generally use a Particle Filter[1] instead to allow me to represent multiple hypothesis about where I am. For example if I see a doorway I know I'm going to be by one of the doorways on the corridor but I won't be able to tell which one without further observation. But if there's a source of absolute but imprecise location, like GPS, then a Kalman filter is a good choice again.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_filter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_filter
- nerpderp83 8y agoCouldn't you fuse this extra fact into a kalman filter?
- Symmetry 8y agoIf you mean your GPS readings then yes you can and should. If you mean having multiple predictions of where you are then no, you would have to either run multiple Kalman filters explicitly or change things so much that it's no longer a Kalman filter.