3 ms·
Tapes are only good for offline storage. If you want online storage, you'll need one drive per tape, and you would get huge lookup times.
by progval 8y ago
Tapes are only good for offline storage.
If you want online storage, you'll need one drive per tape, and you would get huge lookup times.
- paulmd 8y ago> Tapes are only good for offline storage. > If you want online storage, you'll need one drive per tape, No, tape libraries exist, and would be considered 'nearline' storage. https://www.ibm.com/it-infrastructure/storage/tape/library https://www.ibm.com/it-infrastructure/storage/tape/library > and you would get huge lookup times Yes. This is not a good system for random access.
- progval 8y agoIndeed. But the initial investment is very expensive.
- paulmd 8y agoIt depends on your financial scale. A fancy tape library, sure, but if your company is in-sourcing hundreds of TBs of backups surely you are not destitute. Glacier is always cheaper. On the other hand I paid $185 for a LTO-5 drive a year or two ago (no library, manually operated). 1.5 TB on a $20 tape is still pretty good in my book.