3 ms·

30 days blocks are handed out solely by Facebook's own hand. It has nothing to do with this law. You're linking to Breitbart and similar sites. Those are not c

30 days blocks are handed out solely by Facebook's own hand. It has nothing to do with this law. You're linking to Breitbart and similar sites. Those are not credible sources. And please, I'm not a fan of Merkel either. So I don't know what you're on about.

jk2323 8y ago
"30 days blocks are handed out solely by Facebook's own hand. It has nothing to do with this law." It was agreed on with the ruling junta and the "Antonio Amadeus foundation" is intermingling with this. "You're linking to Breitbart and similar sites. " For all things claimed you can find other sources, I used the first google result. You can find them also in your beloved Spiegel. Do you want to see her picture where she is working for the state security and is observing a dissident? I can post it.
- KozmoNau7 8y ago
  Why don't you find some real and credible sources, instead of random Google hits. You can find support for absolutely anything on the internet, but that does not make it objectively true. Your whole shtick of calling the sitting government a "junta" and calling Merkel a stasi agent (with absolutely no credible proof to show for it). I don't even particularly like Merkel, although I will admit she is a very talented politician.
  - jk2323 8y ago
    "with absolutely no credible proof to show for it" You know who this is? https://antilobby.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/merkel_im.jpg?w=436&h=350 https://antilobby.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/merkel_im.jpg?... This is former Stasi agent and current chancellor of Germany in front of the house of former dissident Havelman in East Berlin. Merkel herself forbid the publication of this picture due to "privacy rights". Please not that YOU CAN ONLY HAVE RIGHTS ON YOUR OWN PICTURE! Another dubious source: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/vorab/a-377389.html http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/vorab/a-377389.html
    - KozmoNau7 8y ago
      It's a picture of a woman. How do you know it's Merkel? How do you know it's even a Stasi agent? Where is your credible proof? This is all idle speculation.
      - jk2323 8y ago
        "It's a picture of a woman." Yes. And Merkel has forbidden the publication of exactly this picture, as you can read in the Spiegel article (a major German left wing magazine). Now you have to do some mental acrobatics, but I try to spell it out for you: YOU CAN ONLY CLAIM PRIVACY RIGHTS ON YOUR OWN PICTURE. Is this so hard to understand? The picture was taken in front of the house of dissident Havelman. This fact is not disputed by Merkel. I checked online, I think from Berlin Alexanderplatz it takes 2 or 3 hours to go to his former house by public transport. He lived here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Burgwallstraße,+15537+Grünheide+(Mark),+Germany/@52.4348348,13.8374697,17z https://www.google.com/maps/place/Burgwallstraße,+15537+Grün... The street was heavily guarded, no one could just "walk by there by chance". SO WTF was she doing there? > How do you know it's Merkel? See above. > How do you know it's even a Stasi agent? Supposedly her agent name was "IM Erika" > Where is your credible proof? This is all idle speculation. Yes. Because even that Merkel did not deny that this picture is showing her and that she forbid the publication is "idle speculation that it is here" for you. A fact, published by the major German news magazine. You can even buy a T-Shirt :-) https://www.amazon.com/Federal-Chancellor-Government-Treason-Protest/dp/B01MYOPW8I https://www.amazon.com/Federal-Chancellor-Government-Treason...
        KozmoNau7 8y ago
        You don't have any proof. All you have are a collection of random pieces of supposed "evidence", and you're making significant leaps to desperately connect them. This, and the fact that you insist on calling Merkel left wing, despite proof to the contrary, only supports the conclusion that you are completely off your rocker.
    - deleted 8y ago
      [deleted]

jk2323 8y ago

"30 days blocks are handed out solely by Facebook's own hand. It has nothing to do with this law." It was agreed on with the ruling junta and the "Antonio Amadeus foundation" is intermingling with this. "You're linking to Breitbart and similar sites. " For all things claimed you can find other sources, I used the first google result. You can find them also in your beloved Spiegel. Do you want to see her picture where she is working for the state security and is observing a dissident? I can post it.

KozmoNau7 8y ago
Why don't you find some real and credible sources, instead of random Google hits. You can find support for absolutely anything on the internet, but that does not make it objectively true. Your whole shtick of calling the sitting government a "junta" and calling Merkel a stasi agent (with absolutely no credible proof to show for it). I don't even particularly like Merkel, although I will admit she is a very talented politician.
- jk2323 8y ago
  "with absolutely no credible proof to show for it" You know who this is? https://antilobby.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/merkel_im.jpg?w=436&h=350 https://antilobby.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/merkel_im.jpg?... This is former Stasi agent and current chancellor of Germany in front of the house of former dissident Havelman in East Berlin. Merkel herself forbid the publication of this picture due to "privacy rights". Please not that YOU CAN ONLY HAVE RIGHTS ON YOUR OWN PICTURE! Another dubious source: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/vorab/a-377389.html http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/vorab/a-377389.html
  - KozmoNau7 8y ago
    It's a picture of a woman. How do you know it's Merkel? How do you know it's even a Stasi agent? Where is your credible proof? This is all idle speculation.
    - jk2323 8y ago
      "It's a picture of a woman." Yes. And Merkel has forbidden the publication of exactly this picture, as you can read in the Spiegel article (a major German left wing magazine). Now you have to do some mental acrobatics, but I try to spell it out for you: YOU CAN ONLY CLAIM PRIVACY RIGHTS ON YOUR OWN PICTURE. Is this so hard to understand? The picture was taken in front of the house of dissident Havelman. This fact is not disputed by Merkel. I checked online, I think from Berlin Alexanderplatz it takes 2 or 3 hours to go to his former house by public transport. He lived here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Burgwallstraße,+15537+Grünheide+(Mark),+Germany/@52.4348348,13.8374697,17z https://www.google.com/maps/place/Burgwallstraße,+15537+Grün... The street was heavily guarded, no one could just "walk by there by chance". SO WTF was she doing there? > How do you know it's Merkel? See above. > How do you know it's even a Stasi agent? Supposedly her agent name was "IM Erika" > Where is your credible proof? This is all idle speculation. Yes. Because even that Merkel did not deny that this picture is showing her and that she forbid the publication is "idle speculation that it is here" for you. A fact, published by the major German news magazine. You can even buy a T-Shirt :-) https://www.amazon.com/Federal-Chancellor-Government-Treason-Protest/dp/B01MYOPW8I https://www.amazon.com/Federal-Chancellor-Government-Treason...
      - KozmoNau7 8y ago
        You don't have any proof. All you have are a collection of random pieces of supposed "evidence", and you're making significant leaps to desperately connect them. This, and the fact that you insist on calling Merkel left wing, despite proof to the contrary, only supports the conclusion that you are completely off your rocker.
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]