I'm betting he incurs more legal fees than if the domain were still at a US registrar; but yeah, I agree that if a US court orders the .com back to him, then th

I'm betting he incurs more legal fees than if the domain were still at a US registrar; but yeah, I agree that if a US court orders the .com back to him, then they can make it happen. The whole story is weird. When web.com first locked the domain, why didn't he seek an American court order to force web.com to transfer the domain to a friendly registrar?