2 ms·
Interesting. The only thing I'd offer as a counter-argument is that if the public education monopoly were broken then chances are there'd be a lot of different
by grandalf 16y ago
Interesting. The only thing I'd offer as a counter-argument is that if the public education monopoly were broken then chances are there'd be a lot of different philosophies guiding the emerging schools.
Any top-down system suffers the weakness that a choice made from on high might not be the best for everyone, or that competing approaches might never be explored.
- shawndumas 16y agohttp://reason.com/archives/2010/09/16/money-is-not-what-schools-need http://reason.com/archives/2010/09/16/money-is-not-what-scho...