3 ms·
I glanced through it and none of the facts removed seem particularly controversial. The editor simply put the fact back in and replaced the source. Moreover, w
by crdoconnor 8y ago
I glanced through it and none of the facts removed seem particularly controversial. The editor simply put the fact back in and replaced the source.
Moreover, wikipedia doesn't ban RT as a source and correctly argues that biased sources can be legitimate if they are correct in context.
It seems these days that simply being an anti-establishment politician of any stripe instantly attracts accusations of Russian conspiracy theories. It's weird.
- muddi900 8y agoThat was the intent of Russian misinformation campaign; to create an environment where all sides stop trusting each other.
- crdoconnor 8y agoIf the intent was to have every idiot seeing Russian conspiracy theories around every corner then mission accomplished I guess. Maybe they're going for a "boy who cried wolf" dynamic.