> the article kinda does answer As you say, "kinda." Obviously, the way I understood it, it kinda doesn't. It does make some simple tests, but fails short from

> the article kinda does answer As you say, "kinda." Obviously, the way I understood it, it kinda doesn't. It does make some simple tests, but fails short from concluding (or clearly stating) anything specific in the text of the article. The way I read the article, it still appears to me that there are some specific names active in the scopes used, the way they are used, and that author's code hints at them.