Another example of problematic diagrams in the computing field is the one for systemd. It took me citing one of the systemd developers to point out that it was

Another example of problematic diagrams in the computing field is the one for systemd. It took me citing one of the systemd developers to point out that it was not in fact an accurate diagram. * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Systemd&diff=631112520&oldid=631031336 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Systemd&diff=6311... I observe that this was again that account that you mention, in 2013 taking someone else's work off another WWW site without attributing the creator (or indeed any indication on that other WWW site, that has no free copyright licence that I can find, that the original diagram was freely licensed by that creator and usable on Wikipedia in the first place), taking it out of its original context, and falsely marking as "own work". That account maintains a personal version of the article still calling it "The entire systemd software bundle and its components". * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ScotXW/systemd#Components_of_the_systemd_software_bundle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ScotXW/systemd#Components...