>Imagine if a country like Russia makes an orchestrated effort to achieve similar goals This article is citing references from RT and Sputnik to defend a guys

>Imagine if a country like Russia makes an orchestrated effort to achieve similar goals This article is citing references from RT and Sputnik to defend a guys who broadcast on RT and Sputnik. It cites several fairly normal edits as outrageous. For example Snopes has it's founders names listed but the article implies listing Media Len's founders is an attack. Likewise removing an un-cited assertions are called attacks. And the article apparently believes offering a £1000 for doxing information is acceptable. And remarkably expanding on all this to imply that all of wikipedia is suspect. I would really take this article with a big grain of salt.